Overview example
Subtask Description:
This is not in itself a subtask but it may be useful to create a similar table, where all the indicators –ecological, social and economic- are grouped together.
Action points of the implementation:
- Agree on which ecological indicators you will use in comparing the outcomes of the management options.
- Agree on social indicators for use in comparing the outcomes of management options.
- Agree on economic indicators for assessing the Issue.
Area:
Firth of Clyde, Loch Fyne, Scotland.
Policy Issue:
Implications of increased leisure and tourist use of the Firth of Clyde
Human Activities:
Tourism, aquaculture, fisheries, maritime transport
General Information:
As the Scottish Government aims to keep pace with global tourism trends and achieve 50% revenue growth, with social, economic and environmental stability, a study was made to examine the potential for future development of the sailing industry in the Firth of Clyde. The study suggested that the Clyde estuary could double its berthing capacity for recreational boating by 2015, but this created several stakeholder concerns relatively to the impacts of increased leisure boating to other resource users, particularly mussel aquaculture and navigation, especially in relation to competition for space and water quality.
Example of Implementation:
IMPACT (in priorty) |
OBJECTIVE |
INDICATORS |
Baseline |
||
|
|
Pressures |
States / Conditions |
Societal response |
|
Increase in tourism & leisure |
|
Number of moorings/ berths/ visiting boats |
|
|
Existing levels (2000) |
|
|
Number of wildlife operators |
|
|
|
|
|
Tourism levels |
|
|
|
|
|
Coastal recreation visitor days / overnight trips |
|
|
|
Reduced water quality in the Clyde system |
Maintain & improve water quality to legislative standards - EU, UK |
Number of reported pollution incidents Waste water points |
Quality elements from the WFD and other water quality directives (eg N, P, coliforms etc) |
Acreage of shellfish growing areas with harvest restrictions resulting from pollution |
Legislative standards |
Water quality testing failures |
Status of monitored beaches |
Beach closures |
Trend over time |
||
Competition and conflict for space and resources e.g. moorings, infrastructure |
Minimise conflict for space and resources by integrated development and MSP within ecological carrying capacity |
Number of marinas/moorings |
Aquaculture productivity |
|
|
Land tenure |
Number of sectors and proportional representation |
Presence of marine spatial planning and/or coastal zone partnerships |
|
||
|
Area of coastal water off limits to fishing |
Opportunity costs |
|
||
Disturbance to marine wildlife & ecosystems from leisure operations e.g. wildlife watching, strikes, anchors etc. |
Minimise disturbance to wildlife and habitats through appropriate planning and management instruments |
Number of wildlife watching tours |
Status of indicator species |
Presence of management instruments |
|
Number of infringements / reported incidents |
|
Presence of monitoring/reporting programmes |
|
||
Habitat loss from infrastructure development e.g. marina's etc |
Minimise habitat loss from existing and new leisure infrastructure |
Land use changes |
Status of designated areas |
Protected areas as % of total area |
Habitats Directive |
|
Percentage change in extent of selected marine and coastal habitats |
|
|
||
Socio-economic development in rural communities |
Maximise and diversify the socio-economic development in rural communities in the Clyde in a sustainable context |
|
Value of tourism / leisure industry |
Population within x km of the coast |
|
|
Employment tourism / leisure industry |
|
|
||
|
Employment other industries |
|
|
||
|
Average wage / average national wage |
|
|
||
|
Proportion of seafood sold locally |
|
|
||
|
Population age structure |
|
|
||
|
Economic diversity |
|
|
||
|
Unemployment / GDP |
|
|
||
|
Income distribution / socio-economic index |
|
|
||
Safety incidents and severity |
Improve safety at sea within appropriate regulatory limits and guidelines |
|
Number and severity of accidents |
|
|
|
Number of RNLI boat/tourism/leisure related call-outs |
|
|
||
Carbon footprint of increased leisure activities and associated travel |
Minimise the carbon footprint of leisure travel |
|
Tourist statistics + CO2 emissions (carbon calculator) |
|
|
|
Mode or travel / location |
|
|
Comments:
This example provides a good connection between the identification of indicators and an approach to DPSIR analysis. Yet it would be probably more useful to add an extra column that would provide the “variable” that would be used for the quantification of every indicator and the source of these data or information.
Contact:
Callum Whyte, C.Whyte@napier.ac.uk