Get ready for presentation
Subtask Description:
Prepare your presentation.
Action points of the implementation:
- In preparing a Science-Policy Consultation you have to follow basic ethical rules in order to enhance the quality of both. When planning your presentation and reflecting on the process, go through these ethical rules.
- Tick a list whether you followed these.
- To maximise the effectiveness of the outputs of the System Approach Framework, provide your information as follows:
- Keep your presentation short and simple.
- Use your creativity to produce information compact (where possible), credible and understandable.
- Create and follow a coherent structure
- Agree and produce a combination of different formats, such as appealing (short) texts and images / image effects (possibly even sounds)
- Decide thoroughly which aspects of the results are important to be visualized well (and document why)
- Make sure to take advantage of the Design Step activities and tools provided
- Use institutional and stakeholder mapping.
- Use conceptual modelling.
- Use CATWOE and / or DPSIR.
- Decide and structure the duration of your presentation, whilst keeping in mind your prepared presentation material. A suggested structure is the following:
- Explanation of the objective of the meeting.
- Recapitulation of the process for transparency.
- Showing the usefulness (and limits) of scenarios to the stakeholders.
- General explanation of uncertainties and assumptions.
- Presenting (running) the scenarios for audience.
- Explanation of policy options on which the scenarios are based.
- Comparing Scenarios.
- Cooperate with an external professional facilitator.
- Meet with the facilitator before the stakeholder forum.
Area:
Guadiana Estuary, Portugal (& Spain)
Policy Issue:
Management of the discharges of untreated wastewater into the estuarine environment
Human Activities:
Energy production, tourism, urban activity, agriculture and livestock farming, aquaculture.
General Information:
The estuary is the natural border between Portugal and Spain. On both sides of the estuary, especially in Spain, urban development is taking place, mainly associated with tourism and threatens to increase the inputs of pollutants, namely nutrients and bacteria. Nutrient input is expected to change, not only due to fertilizer application on golf courses, but also due to the river discharge from a large dam, which has accumulated nutrients during its filling. On the Portuguese side, the construction of a large-scale WWTP, designed to serve several urban areas, was successively delayed since it is located within a protected area. The main stakeholder concerns relate to asymmetric development strategies of the two countries and the impact of activities taking place in the watershed on the estuarine and coastal water quality, which has consequences on tourism attractiveness, fisheries, or traditional salt farming.
Example of Implementation:
The presentation that was prepared for the Consultation and Analysis process of the Guadiana Estuary SAF implementation was designed to have two parts: one focused on the ICZM concept (Figure 1) and a second one on the SAF development in the area (Figure 2).
The first part allows understanding what the stakeholders’ ICZM concept is. On the end of this step, a SWOT analysis is undertaken, collecting stakeholder’s input, to shed light on the path towards ICZM both nationally (Portugal) and in the particular case of the Guadiana Estuary, contributing also in the “ice-breaking” for the following discussion of the model results.
Figure 1: Selected slides of the presentation of the Guadiana estuary team, focused on the ICZM concept.
The second part is the most important in what regards the model presentation. The SAF methodology is recapitulated, reiterating the stepwise logic of the SAF implementation, along whit the work done by the scientific team of the Guadiana Estuary. This logic allows demonstrating the importance of scaling down the complexity as needed to model the estuarine system. It also permits the explanation of the basic assumptions established in the model construction. The limitations that a stakeholder could find in the model are taken into account by recognizing what kind of answers the model could produce and what was their meaning, if the simulated conditions and assumptions were maintained as such. The model was not intended to be a precise predictive tool, but rather a tool for understanding how the integrated estuarine system works and allow some exploratory analysis.
Figure 2: Selected slides of the presentation for the SAF development in the Guadiana estuary.
In what regards the model presentation and its results, the underlying equations and modelling queries are omitted, since it was assumed that the model was scientifically robust. The main idea was to give space for discussion, promoting a transition to the deliberation process.
Contact: André Mascarenhas, apmascarenhas@ualg.pt.